SECURE ARCHITECTURE

Design Reviewfor Security

Architectural analysis to identify design flaws and implement Security by Design. Architecture review, threat modeling and secure blueprints for modern projects.

30+
Projects Reviewed
Cloud
+ On-premise
Security
by Design

The Design Review Includes:

  • Complete architecture analysis
  • Structured threat modeling
  • Data flow review
  • Attack surface identification
  • Security control assessment
  • Security architecture blueprint
  • Secure design recommendations
  • Implementation roadmap
  • Compliance mapping
  • Detailed technical documentation
Average timeline:10-15 business days
Approach:Security by Design

Why a Security Design Review?

Fixing design flaws during the planning phase is 10x cheaper than fixing them after implementation. Security by design is the future.

Architectural Expertise

Specialists in modern security architecture

Cloud + On-premise

Security by Design

Security built in from the earliest stage of the project

Preventive

Multiple Architectures

Monolithic, microservices, serverless and hybrid

4+ types

Practical Blueprints

Technical documentation you can implement

100% actionable

The Most Critical Design Problems

The most common architectural flaws we find in projects, and the ones that undermine security from the design stage onward.

Critical

Weak Authentication Design

Inadequate authentication architecture

Missing MFA, insecure sessions, bypass possible

Found in 82% of projects
High

Poor Data Flow

Poorly designed data flow

Sensitive data exposed in transit and at rest

Found in 74% of projects
Critical

Insufficient Access Control

Inadequate access controls

Poorly implemented RBAC, privilege escalation

Found in 78% of projects
High

Insecure Integration

Insecure third-party integrations

Insecure APIs, lack of input validation

Found in 65% of projects
High

Missing Security Controls

Missing security controls

Inadequate logging, monitoring and alerting

Found in 71% of projects
Medium-High

Architecture Complexity

Overly complex architecture

Increased attack surface

Found in 58% of projects

Design Review: Prevention Beats Remediation

Fixing design flaws during implementation costs 10x more than fixing them during planning. A Design Review catches problems before they turn into real vulnerabilities in production.

Our Design Review Methodology

A structured process that combines architectural analysis, threat modeling and security by design principles.

1. Architecture Analysis

Analysis of the current architecture

⏱️ 2-3 days
  • • Document review
  • • Component mapping
  • • Data flow analysis

2. Threat Identification

Threat identification

⏱️ 2-3 days
  • • Attack surface mapping
  • • Entry point analysis
  • • Threat enumeration

3. Security Assessment

Control assessment

⏱️ 3-4 days
  • • Control effectiveness
  • • Gap analysis
  • • Risk assessment

4. Design Recommendations

Design recommendations

⏱️ 2-3 days
  • • Secure architecture
  • • Control design
  • • Implementation guide

5. Documentation

Detailed documentation

⏱️ 2-3 days
  • • Security blueprint
  • • Implementation roadmap
  • • Best practices guide

Full Design Review Scope

Comprehensive coverage, from architectural components through to technical deliverables you can implement.

Architecture Components

Authentication & Authorization
Data Storage & Processing
Network Architecture
API Design & Security
Microservices Architecture
Cloud Security Design
Identity Management
Encryption & Key Management

Frequently Asked Questions About Design Review

Common questions about design review and security architecture.

A Design Review analyzes the architecture and design of a system BEFORE implementation, identifying conceptual flaws. A pentest tests a system that has ALREADY been built. Design Review is preventive; a pentest is validative. Ideally, we run a Design Review before development starts and a pentest once implementation is complete.

Investing in a Design Review

Pricing is based on architectural complexity, the number of components and the depth of analysis required.

Ready for a Secure Architecture?

Bring security by design into your project. Identify and fix architectural flaws before they turn into real vulnerabilities.

Sales Email

[email protected]

WhatsApp/Phone

+55 (15) 99745-2589

Response within 4 business hours
NDA signed before the review

Design Review specialists: Security by Design • Threat Modeling • Cloud & On-premise Architecture • Technical blueprints • Assisted implementation

Why Review Your Security Design Before You Build?

According to Microsoft, fixing design flaws after implementation costs 30x more. A Design Review identifies security architecture problems during the planning phase, before a single line of code is written. Prevention is always cheaper than remediation: the wrong architectural decisions can compromise the security of the entire system.

Key risks of not running a pentest:

Insecure architecture

Fundamental flaws that require a complete refactor

Compromised scalability

Security controls that do not scale

Expensive rework

Costly architectural changes in the middle of the project

Security debt

Poor technical decisions that turn into long-term liabilities

Our design review examines architecture, threat modeling, security controls and data flows before development starts, ensuring solid foundations.

How Does Our Design Review Work?

A methodology based on Threat Modeling and Security by Design:

1

Architecture Analysis

1-2 days

An in-depth review of the proposed design:

  • Analysis of architecture diagrams and data flows
  • Identification of critical components and trust boundaries
  • Review of technology choices (frameworks, libraries)
  • Analysis of third-party integrations
  • Verification of secure architecture patterns

Tools: Document review: HLD, LLD, C4 diagrams, sequence diagrams

2

Threat Modeling

1-2 days

Identifying threats and attack vectors:

  • STRIDE modeling (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, etc.)
  • Attack surface analysis
  • Identification of critical assets and sensitive data
  • Mapping of threat actors and attack scenarios
  • Risk prioritization by impact and likelihood

Tools: Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool, OWASP Threat Dragon

3

Security Controls

1-2 days

Defining the required controls and mitigations:

  • Recommended security controls for each layer
  • Authentication and authorization design
  • Encryption strategy (in transit and at rest)
  • Logging, monitoring and incident response
  • Privacy controls (LGPD, GDPR)

Tools: Framework: OWASP ASVS, NIST Cybersecurity Framework

4

Documentation and Roadmap

1 day

Actionable deliverables for the development team:

  • Review report with findings and recommendations
  • A documented, prioritized threat model
  • Detailed security requirements
  • Secure implementation checklist
  • Presentation for stakeholders and the dev team

Tools: Alignment workshop with architects and developers

Investment: How Does Design Review Pricing Work?

The investment varies with the complexity of the system:

SizeTypical ScopeEstimated Timeline
Simple SystemMonolithic application or a single microservice3-5 days
Moderate SystemMicroservices architecture (3-10 services)5-8 days
Complex SystemMultiple integrated systems8-15 days
Enterprise PlatformFull multi-cloud infrastructure15-30 days

Factors That Influence Pricing:

  • Architecture complexity (monolith vs. microservices)
  • Number of systems and integrations
  • Criticality and sensitivity of the data
  • Regulatory requirements (PCI-DSS, HIPAA, LGPD)
  • Team maturity and existing documentation

Why Request a Quote From Us?

Fixed pricing based on a clearly defined scope

Free kickoff workshop to understand your context

Proposal within 72 hours

A collaborative model: we work WITH your team

Proven ROI: save 30x by preventing refactors

Proven ROI:

Catching architecture flaws at design time costs 30x less than refactoring code in production.

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to the most common questions about our pentest services

1When should I do a Design Review?

Ideally during the planning phase, BEFORE writing any code. It is also valuable for legacy systems about to be refactored, or to validate architectural decisions during development.

2What is the difference between a Design Review and a Code Review?

A Design Review analyzes the ARCHITECTURE and high-level decisions (before the code exists). A Code Review analyzes the CODE that has already been implemented. Design Review prevents fundamental problems; Code Review catches implementation bugs.

3Do I need to have all the documentation ready?

It is not a requirement. If you have diagrams, architecture documents and requirements, great. If you do not, we can run workshops to extract the architecture and document it together.

4Do you do Threat Modeling?

Yes! Threat Modeling is a core part of the Design Review. We identify threats using methodologies such as STRIDE, PASTA or LINDDUN (for privacy).

5How long does it take?

From 3-5 days (simple systems) to 15-30 days (complex enterprise platforms). It depends on the number of components, the integrations involved and the depth you need.

6Do you work with legacy systems?

Yes! Design Review is extremely useful for legacy systems that need modernization or a migration to the cloud. We help identify risks before you move to a new architecture.

7Do you work with cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP)?

Yes! We review cloud-native and serverless architectures, containers (Kubernetes), IaC (Terraform, CloudFormation) and multi-cloud environments. We specialize in the AWS Well-Architected Framework.

8How do I request a quote?

Share your architecture documents (diagrams, HLD/LLD, RFCs) or schedule a free discovery workshop. We will come back with a detailed proposal within 72 hours.

Still have questions?

Get in touch for a free, tailored quote